i do know a typical chorus is “repeal the NFA” but i might posit that it has served its goal. it be still criminal to own an SBR, full auto computer gun, and silencer, but it surely’s expensive and inconvenient to achieve this.
subsequently, there were subsequent to zero incidents of those styles of weapons being used in mass shootings. (There become the Virginia seashore taking pictures with a suppressor however that’s via some distance a statistical outlier compared to the whole number of shootings)
The legislations allows for for lovers to make use of them with out making them simply attainable to a extensive section of the general public. because these weapons are enormously infrequent and expensive, they’re used less in crime.
i’d argue that’s assembly the desired intent of an inexpensive gun control law, holding public security whereas preserving the rights of the legislation-abiding.