i do know a common chorus is “repeal the NFA” however i would posit that it has served its purpose. or not it’s nevertheless prison to own an SBR, full auto computing device gun, and silencer, nevertheless it’s costly and inconvenient to accomplish that.
because of this, there have been next to zero incidents of those forms of weapons being used in mass shootings. (There turned into the Virginia seaside shooting with a suppressor but that’s by using far a statistical outlier in comparison to the total variety of shootings)
The legislation allows for fans to use them without making them conveniently attainable to a large section of the public. because these weapons are quite infrequent and high priced, they are used much less in crime.
i would argue that is meeting the favored intent of an inexpensive gun handle legislations, retaining public defense whereas holding the rights of the legislation-abiding.